JavaServer Faces (JSF) is governed by an Expert Group (EG) that
operates under the Java Community Process (JCP) and represents the
community of JSF developers and component vendors. The EG works on JSF
within the context of a Java Specification Request (JSR). The current
iteration of the JSF specification is JSR-314, otherwise known as JSF 2. The specification defines the API, a standard UI component set and the TCK. It does not include specific implementation details. That is a freedom that is granted to anyone wanting to implement the specification. The mailing list of record for JSF 2.0 Expert Group discussions is jsr-314-open@jcp.org. To join this list in a read-only mode, please send an email to list-request@jcp.org with subscribe jsr-314-open as the Subject. See the section below on "The Extended EG" for the path to write access to this list. The Expert Group:JSR-314 is led by the following two individuals:
An
important group to the JSF specification are the members of the
implementation teams, component library creators and extension writers.
While some of the individuals in this group sit on the EG, others are
not. Regardless, their input is valuable to improving the
specification. While they do not have the responsibility of
participating in the expert group, their unique expertise can help
drive design decisions. Therefore, they are considered part of the extended expert group (EEG) and are granted permission to post to the design list (jsr-314-open). This
priviledge is not intented to exclude general community members, but
rather to keep the discussions on the list focused. Any member of the
JSF community can post to jsr-314-public, which is the open forum for discussion of the JSF specification. Below is a list of the extended EG.
Java and JavaServer Faces are trademarks or registered trademarks of Oracle and/or its affiliates. http://www.javaserverfaces.org is maintained and operated by members of the JSR-314 (JSF 2.0) Expert Group and dedicated community contributors.Got a suggestion to make javaserverfaces.org better? Is there a page we forgot? Please post your suggestion in the community forums. |
Specification >